Discuss the limitations found in the study?

Reading Research LiteratureGuidelines and Grading Rubric Week 5PurposeThe student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and 8)CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and 8)Points:This assignment isworth 225 points.Due Date:Submit to the Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.Requirements1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.Retrieve the following research articles:Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.George, S., & Thomas, S. (2010). Lived experience of diabetes among older, rural people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1092-1100..ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live”>http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-liveHunt, C., Sanderson, B., Ellison, K., (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-management. MedSurg Nursing,23(4), 231-237..chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2012695204&site=eds-live”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2012695204&site=eds-live2. Download NR439_RRL_form and type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your paper does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.3. Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_RRL_Smith.docx.4. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment. The link may be found on the Week 5 Assignments page.5. Submit to the Week 5 Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Please post questions about this paper in the Week 5 Q & A Forum.Grading CriteriaCategoryPoints%DescriptionQuestion 1104%Identifies the purpose of the research article.Question 2104%Identifies the research question implied in the study.Question 3104%Describes the research design of the study.Question 4104%Identifies and describes the population.Question 5104%Was the sample adequate for the research designQuestion 6104%Describe the data collection procedureQuestion 7104%How were the data analyzedQuestion 8104%Describes the limitations in the study.Question 9104%Describes the authors conclusions.Question 10105%How does this advance knowledge in the field.Question 11105%Identifies the purpose of the research article.Question 12105%Identifies the research question implied in the study.Question 13105%Describes the research design of the study.Question 14105%Identifies characteristics of quantitative study.Question 15105%Was the sample adequate for the research designQuestion 16105%Describe the data collection procedureQuestion 17105%How were the data analyzedQuestion 18105%Describes the limitations in the study.Question 19105%Describes the authors conclusions.Question 20105%How does this advance knowledge in the field.Style and Writing2511%Names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.Total225 points100%Grading RubricAssignment CriteriaA(92-100%)Outstanding or Highest Level of PerformanceB(84-91%)Very Good or High Level of PerformanceC76-83%)Competent or Satisfactory Level of PerformanceF0-75%)Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of PerformancePtsQuestion 1Purpose(10 points)Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.910 pointsMostly identifies the purpose of the research article.8 pointsSomewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.7 pointsDoes not answer the question or provides an incorrect answer.06 points/10Question 2Research question(10 points)Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.910 pointsMostly identifies the research question that the author described.8 pointsSomewhat identifies the research question that the author described.7 pointsDoes not answer or fails to identify the research question that the author described.06 points/10Question 3Research design(10 points)Correctly describes the research design of the study910 pointsMostly describes the research design of the study.8 pointsSomewhat describes the research design of the study.7 pointsDoes not describe the design of the study, or inaccurately identifies it.06 points/10Question 4Population(10 points)Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.910 pointsMostly describesidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.8 pointsSomewhatidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.7 pointsDoes notidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.06 points/10Question 5Sample(10 points)Correctly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.910 pointsMostly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied8 pointsSomewhat describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied7 pointsDoesnt answer the question, or misunderstands if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.06 points/10Question 6Data collection(10 points)Correctly describes the data collection procedure.910 pointsMostly describes the data collection procedure.8 pointsSomewhat describes the data collection procedure.7 pointsDoesnt answer the question, or misunderstands the data collection procedure.06 points/10Question 7Data analysis(10 points)Correctly describes how the data was analyzed.910 pointsPartially describes how the data was analyzed.8 pointsMinimally describes how the data was analyzed.7 pointsIncorrectly describes how the data was analyzed or fails to answer06 points/10Question 8Limitations(10 points)Correctlydescribes the limitations in the study.910 pointsMostlydescribes the limitations in the study8 pointsSomewhat describes the limitations in the study.7 pointsIncorrectly describes the limitations in the study or does not answer06 points/10Question 9Conclusions(10 points)Correctly describes the authors conclusions910 pointsMostly describes the authors conclusions8 pointsSomewhat describes the authors conclusions7 pointsIncorrectlydescribes the authors conclusions or does not answer question06 points/10Question 10Advances knowledge(10 points)Correctly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.910 pointsMostly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.8 pointsSomewhat describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.7 pointsIncorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in the field or does not anwer the question.06 points/10Question 11Purpose(10 points)Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.910 pointsMostly identifies the purpose of the research article.8 pointsSomewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.7 pointsDoes not answer the question or provides an incorrect answer.06 points/10Question 12Research question(10 points)Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.910 pointsMostly identifies the research question that the author described.8 pointsSomewhat identifies the research question that the author described.7 pointsDoes not answer or fails to identify the research question that the author described.06 points/10Question 13Research design(10 points)Correctly describes the research design of the study910 pointsMostly describes the research design of the study.8 pointsSomewhat describes the research design of the study.7 pointsDoes not describe the design of the study, or inaccurately identifies it.06 points/10Question 14Population(10 points)Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.910 pointsMostly describesidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.8 pointsSomewhatidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.7 pointsDoes notidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.06 points/10Question 15Sample(10 points)Correctly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.910 pointsMostly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied8 pointsSomewhat describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied7 pointsDoesnt answer the question, or misunderstands if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.06 points/10Question 16Data collection(10 points)Correctly describes the data collection procedure.910 pointsMostly describes the data collection procedure.8 pointsSomewhat describes the data collection procedure.7 pointsDoesnt answer the question, or misunderstands the data collection procedure.06 points/10Question 17Data Analysis(10 points)Correctly describes how the data was analyzed.910 pointsPartially describes how the data was analyzed.8 pointsMinimally describes how the data was analyzed.7 pointsIncorrectly describes how the data was analyzed or fails to answer06 points/10Question 18Limitations(10 points)Correctlydescribes the limitations in the study.910 pointsMostlydescribes the limitations in the study8 pointsSomewhat describes the limitations in the study.7 pointsIncorrectly describes the limitations in the study or does not answer06 points/10Question 19Conclusions(10 points)Correctly describes the authors conclusions910 pointsMostly describes the authors conclusions8 pointsSomewhat describes the authors conclusions7 pointsIncorrectlydescribes the authors conclusions or does not answer question06 points/10Question 20Advances knowledge(10 points)Correctly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.910 pointsMostly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.8 pointsSomewhat describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.7 pointsIncorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in the field or does not anwer the question.06 points/10Style and Writing(25 pts)Correctly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.2325 pointsOne to two errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.2122 pointsThree to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax1920 pointsFive or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.018 points/25Total Points = ____/225Reading Research Literature Week 5Type your answers to the following questions using complete sentences and correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Click Save as and save the file with your last name and assignment, e.g.,NR439_RRL_Smith. Submit to the Week 5 RRL basket in the Dropbox by11:59 pm MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. The guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment may be found in Doc Sharing.Title: RRLName: [replace this text with your name]The following questions pertain to:George, S., & Thomas, S. (2010). Lived experience of diabetes among older, rural people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1092-1100..ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live”>http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live1) What is the purpose of this research?2) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.3) Did the authors describe the research design of this study? If so, give a description.4) Describe the population (sample) for this study.5) Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected?6) Describe the data collection procedure.7) How were the data analyzed after collection?8) Discuss the limitations found in the study.9) Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?10)How does this advance knowledge in the field?The following questions pertain to:Hunt, C., Sanderson, B., Ellison, K., (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-management. MedSurg Nursing,23(4), 231-237..devry.edu/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00008484-201407000-00008&D=ovft&PDF=y”>http://proxy.devry.edu/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00008484-201407000-00008&D=ovft&PDF=y11)What is the purpose of this research?12)What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.13) Did the authors describe the research design of this study? If so, give a description.14)Describe the population (sample) for this study.15)Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected?16) Describe the data collection procedure.17)How were the data analyzed?18)Discuss the limitations found in the study?19)Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?20)How does this advance knowledge in the field.Reading Research LiteratureGuidelines and Grading Rubric Week 5The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and 8)CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and 8)Points:This assignment isworth 225 points.Due Date:Submit to the Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.Retrieve the following research articles:Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.George, S., & Thomas, S. (2010). Lived experience of diabetes among older, rural people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1092-1100..ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live”>http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-liveHunt, C., Sanderson, B., Ellison, K., (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-management. MedSurg Nursing,23(4), 231-237..chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2012695204&site=eds-live”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2012695204&site=eds-live2. Download NR439_RRL_form and type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your paper does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.3. Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_RRL_Smith.docx.4. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment. The link may be found on the Week 5 Assignments page.5. Submit to the Week 5 Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Please post questions about this paper in the Week 5 Q & A Forum.Grading CriteriaCategoryPoints%DescriptionQuestion 1104%Identifies the purpose of the research article.Question 2104%Identifies the research question implied in the study.Question 3104%Describes the research design of the study.Question 4104%Identifies and describes the population.Question 5104%Was the sample adequate for the research designQuestion 6104%Describe the data collection procedureQuestion 7104%How were the data analyzedQuestion 8104%Describes the limitations in the study.Question 9104%Describes the authors conclusions.Question 10105%How does this advance knowledge in the field.Question 11105%Identifies the purpose of the research article.Question 12105%Identifies the research question implied in the study.Question 13105%Describes the research design of the study.Question 14105%Identifies characteristics of quantitative study.Question 15105%Was the sample adequate for the research designQuestion 16105%Describe the data collection procedureQuestion 17105%How were the data analyzedQuestion 18105%Describes the limitations in the study.Question 19105%Describes the authors conclusions.Question 20105%How does this advance knowledge in the field.Style and Writing2511%Names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.Total225 points100%Assignment CriteriaA(92-100%)Outstanding or Highest Level of PerformanceB(84-91%)Very Good or High Level of PerformanceC76-83%)Competent or Satisfactory Level of PerformanceF0-75%)Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of PerformancePtsQuestion 1Purpose(10 points)Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.910 pointsMostly identifies the purpose of the research article.8 pointsSomewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.7 pointsDoes not answer the question or provides an incorrect answer.06 points/10Question 2Research question(10 points)Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.910 pointsMostly identifies the research question that the author described.8 pointsSomewhat identifies the research question that the author described.7 pointsDoes not answer or fails to identify the research question that the author described.06 points/10Question 3Research design(10 points)Correctly describes the research design of the study910 pointsMostly describes the research design of the study.8 pointsSomewhat describes the research design of the study.7 pointsDoes not describe the design of the study, or inaccurately identifies it.06 points/10Question 4Population(10 points)Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.910 pointsMostly describesidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.8 pointsSomewhatidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.7 pointsDoes notidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.06 points/10Question 5Sample(10 points)Correctly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.910 pointsMostly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied8 pointsSomewhat describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied7 pointsDoesnt answer the question, or misunderstands if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.06 points/10Question 6Data collection(10 points)Correctly describes the data collection procedure.910 pointsMostly describes the data collection procedure.8 pointsSomewhat describes the data collection procedure.7 pointsDoesnt answer the question, or misunderstands the data collection procedure.06 points/10Question 7Data analysis(10 points)Correctly describes how the data was analyzed.910 pointsPartially describes how the data was analyzed.8 pointsMinimally describes how the data was analyzed.7 pointsIncorrectly describes how the data was analyzed or fails to answer06 points/10Question 8Limitations(10 points)Correctlydescribes the limitations in the study.910 pointsMostlydescribes the limitations in the study8 pointsSomewhat describes the limitations in the study.7 pointsIncorrectly describes the limitations in the study or does not answer06 points/10Question 9Conclusions(10 points)Correctly describes the authors conclusions910 pointsMostly describes the authors conclusions8 pointsSomewhat describes the authors conclusions7 pointsIncorrectlydescribes the authors conclusions or does not answer question06 points/10Question 10Advances knowledge(10 points)Correctly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.910 pointsMostly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.8 pointsSomewhat describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.7 pointsIncorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in the field or does not anwer the question.06 points/10Question 11Purpose(10 points)Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.910 pointsMostly identifies the purpose of the research article.8 pointsSomewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.7 pointsDoes not answer the question or provides an incorrect answer.06 points/10Question 12Research question(10 points)Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.910 pointsMostly identifies the research question that the author described.8 pointsSomewhat identifies the research question that the author described.7 pointsDoes not answer or fails to identify the research question that the author described.06 points/10Question 13Research design(10 points)Correctly describes the research design of the study910 pointsMostly describes the research design of the study.8 pointsSomewhat describes the research design of the study.7 pointsDoes not describe the design of the study, or inaccurately identifies it.06 points/10Question 14Population(10 points)Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.910 pointsMostly describesidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.8 pointsSomewhatidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.7 pointsDoes notidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.06 points/10Question 15Sample(10 points)Correctly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.910 pointsMostly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied8 pointsSomewhat describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied7 pointsDoesnt answer the question, or misunderstands if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.06 points/10Question 16Data collection(10 points)Correctly describes the data collection procedure.910 pointsMostly describes the data collection procedure.8 pointsSomewhat describes the data collection procedure.7 pointsDoesnt answer the question, or misunderstands the data collection procedure.06 points/10Question 17Data Analysis(10 points)Correctly describes how the data was analyzed.910 pointsPartially describes how the data was analyzed.8 pointsMinimally describes how the data was analyzed.7 pointsIncorrectly describes how the data was analyzed or fails to answer06 points/10Question 18Limitations(10 points)Correctlydescribes the limitations in the study.910 pointsMostlydescribes the limitations in the study8 pointsSomewhat describes the limitations in the study.7 pointsIncorrectly describes the limitations in the study or does not answer06 points/10Question 19Conclusions(10 points)Correctly describes the authors conclusions910 pointsMostly describes the authors conclusions8 pointsSomewhat describes the authors conclusions7 pointsIncorrectlydescribes the authors conclusions or does not answer question06 points/10Question 20Advances knowledge(10 points)Correctly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.910 pointsMostly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.8 pointsSomewhat describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.7 pointsIncorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in the field or does not anwer the question.06 points/10Style and Writing(25 pts)Correctly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.2325 pointsOne to two errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.2122 pointsThree to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax1920 pointsFive or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.018 points/25Total Points = ____/225Reading Research Literature Week 5Type your answers to the following questions using complete sentences and correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Click Save as and save the file with your last name and assignment, e.g.,NR439_RRL_Smith. Submit to the Week 5 RRL basket in the Dropbox by11:59 pm MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. The guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment may be found in Doc Sharing.Title: RRLName: [replace this text with your name]The following questions pertain to:George, S., & Thomas, S. (2010). Lived experience of diabetes among older, rural people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1092-1100..ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live”>http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live1) What is the purpose of this research?2) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.3) Did the authors describe the research design of this study? If so, give a description.4) Describe the population (sample) for this study.5) Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected?6) Describe the data collection procedure.7) How were the data analyzed after collection?8) Discuss the limitations found in the study.9) Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?10)How does this advance knowledge in the field?The following questions pertain to:Hunt, C., Sanderson, B., Ellison, K., (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-management. MedSurg Nursing,23(4), 231-237..devry.edu/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00008484-201407000-00008&D=ovft&PDF=y”>http://proxy.devry.edu/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00008484-201407000-00008&D=ovft&PDF=y11)What is the purpose of this research?12)What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.13) Did the authors describe the research design of this study? If so, give a description.14)Describe the population (sample) for this study.15)Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected?16) Describe the data collection procedure.17)How were the data analyzed?18)Discuss the limitations found in the study?19)Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?20)How does this advance knowledge in the field.